The New Jersey Presidential primary election is just two days a way and I still have not decided which Democratic candidate I will vote for. I've come across some interesting media in the last few days about the Obama vs. Clinton decision that I wanted to share.
The first is "The Test", a phenomenal article by John Heilemann and the cover story in the latest issue of New York Magazine. The piece does a great job of profiling the two candidates and boiling down the decision that Democrats are faced with to its essence:
If you find yourself drawn to the Clinton candidacy, you likely
believe that politics is politics, that partisanship isn’t
transmutable, that Republicans are for the most part irredeemable. You
suspect that talk of transcendence amounts to humming “Kumbaya” past
the graveyard. You believe that progress comes only with a fight, and
that Clinton is better equipped than Obama (or maybe anyone) to succeed
in the poisonous, fractious environment that Washington is now and ever
shall be. You ponder the image of Bill as First Laddie and find
yourself smiling, not sighing or shrieking.
If
you find yourself swept up in Obamamania, on the other hand, you regard
this assessment as sad, defeatist, as a kind of capitulation. You’re
perfectly aware that politics is often a dirty business. But you
believe it could be a bit cleaner, a bit nobler, a bit more sustaining.
You think that paradigm shifts can happen, that the system can be
rebooted. Most of all, an attraction to Obama indicates you are, on
some level, a romantic. You never had your JFK, your MLK, and you
desperately crave one: What you want is to fall in love.
A
vote for Clinton, in other words, is a wager rooted in hard-eyed
realism. Her upside may be limited, but so is her downside, because
although the ceiling on her putative presidency might be low, the floor
beneath it is fairly high. A vote for Obama, as the Big Dog said, is
indeed a role of the dice. The risks of his hypothetical presidency are
higher, but the potential payoff is greater: He could be the next Jack
Kennedy—or the next Jimmy Carter. The gamble here entails both the
thrill and the terror of letting yourself dream again.
The other piece is a video interview with an average New Yorker who was planning on voting for John Edwards but is now left deciding between Obama and Clinton: Undecided in New York
I still haven't come to a final decision, but I now may be leaning in one direction.
I also wanted to share that I recently found out that independent or unaffiliated voters can vote in the Presidential primary election in New Jersey by declaring a party affiliation at the polling place (this is not the case in New York). So if you're one of those people there's no excuse not to vote on Tuesday.